Ask A Lawyer
Contact Us
RegisterUS Import and Export Compliance for Chinese Companies: Customs Valuation, Section 301 Tariffs, and Supply Chain Strategy
Chinese companies exporting to the United States face an increasingly complex regulatory landscape spanning customs classification, tariff mitigation, export controls, and economic sanctions compliance. This article addresses the key compliance areas that Chinese exporters and US-incorporated Chinese companies must navigate.
Customs Classification and Valuation
All goods imported into the United States must be classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Correct classification determines the applicable duty rate and any quota or trade remedy restrictions. Chinese exporters should work with US customs brokers and legal counsel to obtain binding ruling letters from US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) where classification is uncertain. Customs valuation under the Trade Agreements Act follows the transaction value method as the primary basis, being the price actually paid or payable for the goods. CBP may reject the declared transaction value where the buyer and seller are related and the relationship influenced the price, in which case alternative valuation methods apply sequentially: transaction value of identical goods, value of similar goods, deductive value, computed value, and the fallback method.
Section 301 and Section 232 Tariffs
Chinese-origin goods remain subject to Section 301 tariffs imposed under the Trade Act of 1974, covering four lists of products with duty rates ranging from 7.5 percent to 25 percent. The exclusion process has been reopened periodically, allowing US importers to request exclusion of specific products from Section 301 duties where the product is not available from non-Chinese sources. Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum products apply on a country-specific basis, with certain product exclusions available through a separate application process administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). Chinese companies exporting steel or aluminum products to the US should verify whether their specific products are subject to Section 232 duties and whether any country-specific quota arrangements apply.
Export Administration Regulations
Chinese companies exporting from the US or receiving US-origin technology must comply with the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) administered by BIS. The EAR controls the export and re-export of dual-use goods, software, and technology. Items are classified under the Commerce Control List (CCL) with an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) that determines license requirements. Chinese companies should verify whether their products, technology, or software require a license before export or re-export to China or other destinations. The Entity List maintained by BIS identifies foreign persons believed to be involved in activities contrary to US national security or foreign policy interests. Export of EAR-controlled items to Entity List parties is subject to a license requirement with a presumption of denial.
OFAC Sanctions Compliance
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers US economic sanctions programs targeting Iran, North Korea, Syria, Russia, Venezuela, and other jurisdictions. Chinese financial institutions processing US-dollar transactions must implement sanctions compliance programs including sanctioned party screening, transaction monitoring, and reporting of blocked property. Penalties for sanctions violations can reach USD 20 million per violation or twice the transaction value. Chinese companies involved in international trade should conduct OFAC risk assessments, implement sanctions screening software, and include sanctions compliance clauses in their international contracts.
Supply Chain Restructuring
Many Chinese manufacturers are restructuring their supply chains to reduce US tariff exposure through nearshoring, foreign trade zone utilization, and free trade agreement preference claims. The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) provides preferential tariff treatment for goods originating in North America. The Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and various free trade agreements offer duty-free access for qualifying products from eligible countries. Chinese companies should evaluate tariff engineering options, first-sale valuation strategies, and duty drawback opportunities as part of their supply chain planning.
Entity List and Unverified List Compliance
Chinese companies must conduct due diligence on the Entity List and Unverified List published by BIS, which identify foreign persons subject to enhanced export restrictions. Exports of EAR-controlled items to Entity List parties require a license with a presumption of denial. The Unverified List identifies parties where BIS could not verify the bona fides of entities during end-use checks, resulting in a license requirement for exports of items subject to the EAR that would otherwise not require a license. Reliable screening software should be implemented to screen customers, distributors, and end users against these lists before any transaction is completed.
Prior Disclosure and Penalty Mitigation
Chinese importers who discover errors in their prior import declarations may voluntarily disclose the violations to CBP through the prior disclosure process. Properly filed prior disclosures substantially reduce penalties that would otherwise be assessed. The prior disclosure must be submitted before CBP initiates an investigation and must include a detailed description of the violations, the circumstances under which they were discovered, and a calculation of the lost duties. CBP regulations provide that prior disclosures reduce the maximum penalty from the value of the merchandise to the loss of revenue plus interest for fraud cases, and to the loss of revenue for negligence cases. Importers should conduct regular internal audits of their customs compliance to identify potential errors before CBP discovers them through a Focused Assessment or targeted examination.
Anti-Circumvention Enforcement
US Customs investigates circumvention of antidumping and countervailing duty orders through minor modifications to product design, assembly operations in third countries, or transshipment through intermediate destinations. The Enforce and Protect Act of 2015 established formal procedures for alleging circumvention. Chinese exporters subject to AD/CVD orders should verify that their product modifications and supply chain arrangements do not inadvertently trigger circumvention inquiries. Penalties for circumvention include retroactive application of duties for up to five years, civil penalties equal to the value of the merchandise, and criminal liability for knowing violations.
Customs Audits and Compliance
US Customs and Border Protection conducts Focused Assessments of importers covering valuation, classification, and duty computation. Chinese importers should maintain records for at least five years including import entry summaries, commercial invoices, bills of lading, packing lists, certificates of origin, and correspondence with customs brokers. The Importer Self-Assessment program allows certified compliant importers to self-monitor with reduced CBP audit frequency. Participation requires a demonstrated history of compliance, a written compliance improvement plan, and agreement to periodic CBP verification visits. ISA participants benefit from reduced examination rates, prior disclosure streamlining, and enhanced cooperation credit in penalty proceedings.
Section 301 Exclusion Strategy
The Office of the US Trade Representative has periodically reopened the exclusion process for products subject to Section 301 tariffs from China. Exclusion requests must demonstrate that the product is available only from China, that the imposition of tariffs would cause severe economic harm to the US importer or end users, and that the product is not strategically important or related to Made in China 2025 industrial policy objectives. US importers of Chinese-origin goods should monitor USTR announcements and be prepared to file exclusion requests within the designated filing windows, typically 30 to 60 days.
Record Keeping and Compliance Systems
Chinese companies subject to US import and export regulations should implement comprehensive trade compliance management systems including automated screening software for denied party lists, classification databases, license determination workflows, and audit trail documentation. The Electronic Export Information filing through the Automated Export System must be completed before export for all shipments exceeding USD 2,500 per Schedule B classification. Voluntary self-disclosure to BIS for EAR violations and to OFAC for sanctions violations should be considered where past compliance errors are identified through internal audit. Both BIS and OFAC guidelines provide that voluntary self-disclosure may result in reduced penalties.
Internal compliance audits should be conducted at least annually with reporting to senior management. The audit should cover classification accuracy, valuation methodology correctness, AD/CVD compliance, and OFAC screening effectiveness. External auditors with customs law expertise should be engaged triennially to verify the effectiveness of the compliance program and to identify areas for improvement.
