Fraud and Economic Crime in China: Legal Risks for Foreign Companies

14. July 2026

Fraud and economic crime are serious offenses under Chinese criminal law. Foreign companies operating in China face risks both as potential victims of fraud and as subjects of regulatory investigation. Understanding the legal framework, including the definitions of specific economic crimes and the available remedies, is essential for effective risk management and compliance. The PRC Criminal Law defines and penalizes a wide range of economic crimes with increasingly severe penalties in recent amendments.

Common economic crimes include contract fraud under Article 224 of the Criminal Law, which prohibits obtaining property through deception in the course of entering into or performing a contract. The threshold for criminal prosecution of contract fraud in most jurisdictions is 20,000 RMB for basic fraud, with higher thresholds applying for large amounts and extremely large amounts. Other frequently prosecuted economic crimes include invoice fraud, embezzlement by company personnel, intellectual property infringement including trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy, securities fraud and insider trading, and money laundering. The Criminal Law provides for severe penalties, including fixed-term imprisonment, life imprisonment in extreme cases, and substantial fines. Companies should implement robust internal controls, including segregation of duties, regular audits, whistleblower hotlines, and anti-corruption compliance programs to detect and prevent fraudulent activities.

When a foreign company discovers it has been defrauded by a Chinese partner or employee, the first step is to gather and preserve evidence, conduct an internal investigation, and consider filing a criminal complaint with the local Public Security Bureau. The police have broad investigative powers including the ability to freeze bank accounts, seize documents and electronic devices, place suspects under residential surveillance, and impose travel restrictions. Parallel civil proceedings may also be available to recover losses through asset preservation orders and claims for damages. Foreign victims should engage Chinese legal counsel experienced in both criminal and civil proceedings to coordinate the most effective legal strategy.

Prevention is the best defense in the Chinese business environment. Due diligence on business partners should include verification of the company's business license, tax registration, and legal representative identification through the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. Clear contractual terms specifying dispute resolution mechanisms, payment milestones, and liability allocation are essential. Regular financial audits, proper internal reporting mechanisms, and employee training on anti-fraud policies can significantly reduce the risk of becoming a victim of economic crime in China. The statute of limitations for criminal prosecution depends on the maximum penalty for the specific offense, ranging from five years for minor offenses to twenty years for the most serious crimes.

Foreign companies doing business in China should also be aware of their obligations under China's anti-money laundering regulations, which require financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses to implement customer due diligence procedures, report large-value and suspicious transactions to the China Anti-Money Laundering Monitoring and Analysis Center, and maintain transaction records. Non-compliance with anti-money laundering obligations can result in administrative penalties, suspension of business operations, and in serious cases, criminal liability for responsible officers.

Economic crime investigations involving foreign companies can be complex and may implicate multiple jurisdictions. Chinese authorities increasingly cooperate with foreign law enforcement agencies through mutual legal assistance treaties and the INTERPOL framework. Foreign companies should ensure they have a crisis management plan in place that includes protocols for responding to investigations, preserving legal privilege, managing communications with stakeholders, and coordinating with legal counsel in multiple jurisdictions.

Criminal Procedure Application Notes

I document scope, assumptions, and decision rights at engagement start so foreign clients know what will be filed, who must approve, and when silence becomes a missed deadline.

I treat bilingual consistency as a risk control: chops, authority documents, and English summaries must tell the same commercial story.

Foreign individuals and companies typically need three workstreams in parallel: factual chronology, authority paperwork, and remedy selection. I keep those streams visible in status notes so headquarters can decide without re-reading the entire file. Where local counterparties rely on relationship pressure, I re-anchor discussions to contract text, statutory rights, and verifiable performance records. Fee arrangements, conflict checks, and confidentiality boundaries are confirmed before substantive drafting or filings begin. After key milestones I deliver a short handover: decisions made, open conditions, filing receipts, and calendar items for renewals or enforcement. This operating rhythm reduces repeat disputes and keeps institutional knowledge with the client rather than trapped in chat history.